Some of the M1A models, like the SOCOM 16, feature a fantastic muzzle break that will change the way you think about the. One of the biggest advantages was how easy the follow up shots were, thanks again to the low recoil. To give the M1A a real test, I set up several 10” steel plates at 150, 200, and 250 yards down range, and I had zero trouble knocking them down. One magazine in, I was surprised at the felt recoil of this rifle, especially considering its high-powered ammo.
So far, my trial run with the M1A was running smoothly and I had no real complaints. I’m a big fan of Springfield’s trigger selection– I really liked the resistance and the crisp and natural feel of the two-stage trigger. The advantage of using this model as opposed to a more classic one is that the modern synthetic finish shreds about a half a pound from the overall weight compared to the walnut version, in addition to offering a more comfortable grip. I really liked the way it felt in my hands, even on a hot summer’s day. The model I was able to get my hands was outfitted with a non-slip black synthetic grip and stock.
Springfield M1A PERFORMANCE I really liked the way it felt in my hands, even on a hot summer’s dayĬonsidering the Springfield’s reputation, I had some serious expectations on how well the M1A would perform. Additionally, SA no longer keeps the original selector switch cutout on the back right end of their receivers. And while some folks may claim that cast receivers aren’t as good as forged, you’d have to be in some pretty extreme environments and shooting some pretty extreme volumes of ammo to notice a difference. Currently, Springfield manufactures their M1A receivers out of durable precision investment cast AISI 8620 alloy steel, while the original rifle was produced through the more tedious and expensive drop forge process. The most notable distinction between these two rifles is in their receivers both in terms of what they’re made of and the process by which they are made. 0520) Aperture Rearīefore I get into the M1A specifically, I think it’s important to look at the differences between it and its predecessor, the M14. 062″ Blade Front & Match Grade (Non – Hooded. For now, it’s time to begin the Gunivore exclusive review of Springfield’s M1A tactical rifle series. For more information about Springfield and for an overview of their sweet lineup of guns, check out my piece here. The Reese Family acquired the illustrious Springfield name in the hopes of continuing their storied legacy of producing historically significant weapons through their use of modern and innovative engineering practices. In my opinion, this firearm is the epitome of what Springfield Armory is all about. At that point, Springfield took the M14 platform, made a few essential changes, and turned it into a civilian legal semi-auto, under the new name: M1A.Įven to this day, these rifles can be found hunting big game, winning countless marksman competitions, and even in life-saving tactical missions. However, as with all things, the M14’s service time was winding down, and it was out with the old and in with the new. This amazing rifle quickly became an American staple due to its unrivaled reliability and powerful 7.62×51 NATO cartridge. government developed the new and improved M14.
Looking through history, when the famous M1 Garand was ready to be phased out of use, the U.S. Springfield’s principal long-range weapon, the M1A, is not just any other tactical rifle this class-defining carbine is the product of over 75 years of advanced weapons engineering.